Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Multiplier Theory of J. M. Keynes

We know that there are two key concepts Marginal Propensity to consume (MPC), and Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS). What is not consumed is automatically saved, and what is saved, a part or whole of it is automatically invested. The savings in done by the consuming, household sector, and the investment is done by the producing sector.

Change in Income(ΔY) = $100
Change in Consumption(Δ) = $80,
Change in Savings(ΔS) = $20

We also know that ΔY = ΔC + ΔS
Dividing both sides by ΔY,

We get ΔY/ ΔY = ΔC/ΔY + ΔS/ΔY

Or, 1 = ΔC/ΔY + ΔS/ΔY

Or, 1 = 80/100 + 20/100
Or, 4/5 + 1/5 = 1
Or, b + s = 1

We can now use an imaginary table.

Prof. Keynes introduced two major inferences.

1. If income increases, consumption will also increase, but less than proportionately (as part of the change in income is saved.)

2. The Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) is less than Average Propensity to Consume (APC). Average Propensity to Consume is Total Consumption divided by Total Income.

The Multiplier

b + s = 1
Or, s = 1 - b

Or, 1/s = 1/(1-b) = the multiplier "m".
"m" is the reciprocal of the marginal Propensity to Save.
m = 1/s = 1/(ΔS/ΔY) = 1/{1-(ΔC/ΔY)}

According to Mr. Keynes, the change in income ΔY = multiplier times change in investment, ΔI.

According to our above example, b = 4/5 and s = 1/5

Therefore, m = 1/s = 1/(1/5) = 5

ΔY = m(ΔI)

If investment changes by $100, then income changes by

ΔY = 5($100) = $500

Thus if investment increases, national income will also increase, not by the same amount, but by a multiple of it. Another point made by Prof. Keynes was that if the consumption expenditure of the community increases, the value of "b" will be larger and larger, and so also the value of the multiplier, and so also the national income.

The multiplier is the reciprocal of Marginal Propensity to Save. Corresponding to each value of "b" there will be a particular value of "s", and corresponding to each value of "s", there will be a particular value of "m".
Change in income ΔY = multiplier (m) times change in investment, ΔI

The Logic of the Multiplier
According to Mr. Keynes, the multiplier means that a small increase in investment will lead to a multiple increase in income. One man's expenditure is another man's income, and vice versa. When a man spends a part of his income, say $X, he creates an income of others of $X. The second person will again save a part of $X, and spend the rest. Again, the second man's expenditure creates an income for the third person. Thus the same money goes on creating incomes for a number of persons. This process leads to the following equations, where "b" is the part of the income spent, or MPC.

Larger the value of "b", greater will be the change in income.
The root cause of unemployment is deficiency in demand. And the only way to stimulate the economy in depression is to increase the demand through public or government expenditure programmes. Fresh expenditure will generate new incomes, and the multiplier process will set in. The multiplier effect will ultimately restore the full-employment situation.

Assumptions: In order to explain the Multiplier theory Mr. Keynes made the following assumptions:

1. Consumption always changes with change in income. In other words, consumption will always depend on income.

2. Marginal Propensity to Consume will remain constant.

3. There is change in Autonomous Investment. Autonomous Investment means when investment takes place even when there is no increase in income.

Limitations: The following factors will set a limit to the working of the multiplier.

1. Leakages: The higher the Marginal Propensity to Consume, the higher will be the value of the multiplier. The income, which is received, should be spent, so that it may again come back as income. If people prefer to keep cash balances idle, for transactions, precautionary or speculative motives, income created will naturally be less.

2. Consumption Goods: With the rise in income, consumption goods should be readily available in sufficient quantities, so that additional income may be spent on them. If there is shortage of goods, additional income received may not be fully spent. The Marginal Propensity to Consume will be low, and therefore the multiplier will be low.

3. Multiplier Period: The time gap between the receipt of income and consumption expenditure is known as the Multiplier Period. The smaller the time span of the multiplier period, the higher will be the value of the multiplier.

4. Investment: Any increase in investment in one sector should not be accompanied by a decrease in investment in another sector. Increments in investments should be repeated at regular intervals.

5. Full Employment Ceiling: If the economy is working at or near full-employment level, fresh investment outlay cannot lead to an increase in the supply of consumption goods. It will not raise aggregate income but will lead to price rise. Full-employment situation is called the economy's inflation threshold.

6. Induced Investment: Just as a change in investment induces consumption, so also induced consumption can influence investment. But the multiplier effect does not take this into consideration.

Conclusion: Though there are some limits in the workings of the multiplier, Mr. Keynes used this concept to advocate public investment during a period of depression.

Must also read: 1. Consumption and savings

2. Consumption Function and Savings Function

No comments:

Post a Comment

Want to say something? Say it!

Update(s):Post(s) under preparation: -
View Chandra Bhanu's Art at


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...


indifference curve investment demand-pull inflation economy fiscal policy monetary policy cost-push inflation demand demand for money destabilized economy economics stagflation supply of money Opportunity Cost Quantity Theory of Money Theory of Consumption World economy automatic stabilizer capital choice consumption function current accounts deficit deflationary gap demand for investment depression derivation effects of inflation equilibrium fiscal deficit fresh investment growth imbalance inflation interest money perfect competition savings savings function world Accounting Profit Adam Smith Alfred Marshall Diminishing Marginal Utility Economic Profit Equimarginal Utility General Equilibrium Theory IS Curve J. M. Keynes Keynes' Theory of employment LM Curve Lionel Robbins Normal Profit PPC Production Possibility curve Software system development Utility Analysis accelerator account accounting alternative uses autonomous investment balance of payments book keeping capital goods classical theory of the rate of interest commodity consumer consumer goods consumption credit debit definition deflation discretionary double entry economic functions economic wants educated education ends energy ermployment full employment functions of money growth rate habit imitation imperfect competition income income analysis income determination income effect induced investment inflationary gap investment function knowledge labour less than full employment liquidity preference theory long run long run equilibrium means monetary analysis monetary measures monopoly multiplier price price effect price maker production possibility frontier profit maximization propensity revealed preference analysis sacrifice say's Law scarce science shifts of IS LM curves short run short run equilibrium shut down conditions slow down society stagnation student subsidies subsidy substitution effect success sunk capital supply supply of savings technology unproductive wealth world economy 2012